The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    lolz, look how responsive Adobe can be... when they want to be...

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by count_schemula, Nov 19, 2007.

  1. count_schemula

    count_schemula Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    331
    Messages:
    1,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    count_schemula, Nov 19, 2007
    #1
  2. 00fez

    00fez Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    137
    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The thing about adobe is that they wrote the apps using mostly carbon, or something i think. And leopard is dropping something related to carbon, i think. So if adobe wants them to be fully compatible with leopard, then they have to do a major code overhaul. It's somewhere along those lines. I read it on ars' review of leopard.
     
    00fez, Nov 19, 2007
    #2
  3. count_schemula

    count_schemula Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    331
    Messages:
    1,445
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    But this (Apple's core roadmap, no pun intended) has been known for years, and if Apple rewrote everything for CS3, why did they do it using technology that is planned to be phased out?
     
    count_schemula, Nov 19, 2007
    #3