The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    file structure and external drive

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by fredf, Nov 8, 2007.

  1. fredf

    fredf Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I asked a couple of days ago about getting an external HDD.

    I know that the WD mybook studio is recommended and it is formated as OS Extended (Journal). I can't easily get one of these. Around here everyone is selling Lacie. These are formatted as FAT 32 drives.

    I be using the drive for storage of both Windows and Mac files.

    Questions:
    What are the pros/cons of using FAT 32 drive? As far as I know there is only the issue of no file being larger than 4 gig (which may occasionally happen).
    Are there any other downsides to FAT 32 or benefits of OS Extended?

    Thanks
     
  2. InlawBiker

    InlawBiker Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    This may be a dumb question, but why can't you just re-format it using the file system of your choice?

    Greg.
     
  3. fredf

    fredf Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    that's fair enough, I was just wondering which is better.
    By the way, another question: is there any reason why I cannot partition it with a FAT 32 partition and an OSX Entended?
     
  4. InlawBiker

    InlawBiker Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You could do both Fat32 and OSX. I think the limit on partitions on one disk is 8, but I could be wrong.

    Fat32 has the advantage of being portable to just about anything. Windows, Linux, Mac can all mount and read/write Fat32. But it lacks the extended security and features of the more complex filesystems.

    For instance Mac stores additional data for files, i.e. the icon and program association in the resource fork. Fat32 won't support a resource fork, so the Mac will create hidden files to store this data on a Fat32 drive. So it will look and work the same, but it's not the most efficient, which is probably why your software wants you to use the native parition.

    I have a 250gb external drive that I leave as Fat32, so I can back up files to it from my Windows or Linux machines, and see them from anywhere. But I can't set NTFS or Linux extended security settings on that drive. If I were using it exclusively for installing programs onto, or just for Windows or Linux, I'd format it NTFS or ext3. So it depends on your use.
     
  5. wobble987

    wobble987 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    543
    Messages:
    2,871
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    FAT32 is not as reliable as HFS+ or NTFS. it is prone to failure (losing/corrupted data, or even complete lost of data on the volume). FAT32 doesn't have journaling which is essential. i don't think spotlight works with FAT32. etc.. so basically don't use FAT32 on large volumes (such as external HDD) unless you really, really, really have to.
     
  6. sasanac

    sasanac Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    144
    Messages:
    456
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You could try something like MacDrive http://www.mediafour.com/products/macdrive/ if you install that on your PC then you can format your HD to Mac format and still be able to read it from Windows. There's a free trial version if you want to test it out before buying it..
     
  7. dhisharp

    dhisharp Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I was under the impression that fat32 can't be more 32gb in size - true or false ?
     
  8. Budding

    Budding Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,686
    Messages:
    3,982
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    False. It's a few TB. Although there are some formatting applications that don't allow you to format more than a few GBs, which is why one should use GParted or PartitionMagic.
     
  9. thnksfrthmmrs

    thnksfrthmmrs Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    294
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So does that mean Mac OS can't format a preformatted FAT32 external drive to HFS+ so you can use it with Time Machine?
     
  10. wobble987

    wobble987 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    543
    Messages:
    2,871
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    you're thinking about windows xp aren't you? the formatter that came with windows xp doesn't allow formatting for volume biger than 32gb.

    huh? whaaaa?
    Mac OS can reformat volume wheter it be NTFS, FAT32, to HFS+.

    yeah if you use FAT32 you can use Time Machine with that volume. Time Machine only works with HFS+ drives.
     
  11. kgeier82

    kgeier82 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    129
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    something i havent seen mentioned....fat32 only supports file sizes UP TO 4GB max.

    thats a big blah
     
  12. sasanac

    sasanac Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    144
    Messages:
    456
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have a FAT32 hard drive in my PC at the moment which is 60Gb... it seems to be working ok to me and has done for many years! (it was originally formatted in 2k and now used in a Vista HP x64 machine) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#FAT32
    Is the max supported size lower on a mac or something?

    *edit I take it back, I formatted it via DOS utilities not in Win 2K...
     
  13. Xander

    Xander Paranoid Android

    Reputations:
    1,321
    Messages:
    1,455
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I think you misunderstood. kgeier82 is talking about the maximum size of a single file, not the total volume. From the same Wikipedia article you linked to:

     
  14. sasanac

    sasanac Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    144
    Messages:
    456
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    ah sorry I quoted from the wrong post, sorry kgeier82! I meant to refer to the 32gb limit post. (I put it down to having had a couple of drinks at lunchtime on Saturday!)