The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    XP and Vista performance on Macbook?

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by lolmannz, May 17, 2007.

  1. lolmannz

    lolmannz Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Just a quick question, is running XP or Vista using bootcamp on a Macbook, slower than the same specs of a non apple laptop? I understand it should be the same because all bootcamp is, is just a boot config utility and Windows is still running on the same hardware, but I just want to make sure before I buy :)

    Thanks in advance.

    P.S. Also if anyone could give me their performance score in Vista on their macbook that would be nice.

    Preferably with 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo, 1GB ram.
     
  2. Sneaky_Chopsticks

    Sneaky_Chopsticks Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    460
    Messages:
    1,647
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It's better to use Apple's Parallel software. You can run both windows and MAC OS X at the same time.

    However, I'd rather you wait till this fall, because Apple's new Leopard OS is going to come with Bootcamp.

    I haven't tried the bootcamp, but I heard it had some great performance with xp and vista.
     
  3. sp00n

    sp00n Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    512
    Messages:
    1,684
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It'll run just as fast as any PC notebook with the same hardware.

    I think I got a base score of 3.2 the last time I booted into Vista via BootCamp. The score is based off of the lowest number, which is the graphics card in the case of the Macbook.
     
  4. zadillo

    zadillo Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    421
    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    "better" is subjective...... Parallels is good for some things, but for full performance, virtualization will never be as good as running the full OS booted directly.

    Btw, Parallels is third party software, not from Apple.

    There isn't any reason to wait til Fall to use Boot Camp; it can be used now in beta form.
     
  5. sp00n

    sp00n Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    512
    Messages:
    1,684
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I don't really see the need for BootCamp besides for gaming. Parallels is convenient, and almost as fast a native Windows machine as long as you have enough RAM.
     
  6. zadillo

    zadillo Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    421
    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Aside from gaming, any other kind of intensive app that needed a lot of RAM in Windows or to use the GPU would also be better used in BootCamp.

    Honestly, it all depends on what someone's needs are.
     
  7. lolmannz

    lolmannz Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Thanks guys, the main reason I want to check the performance of Windows running natively is because I think I'll be spending a lot of time in Windows and I just want to make sure it doesn't run any slower than non-apple laptops.

    I guess I'll go buy it next week some time :D
     
  8. zadillo

    zadillo Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    421
    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    If you're going to be spending a lot of time in Windows, wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to just get a Windows laptop? Or do you still plan on using OS X a lot as well?
     
  9. system_159

    system_159 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    363
    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I spend a lot of time in Windows for work, but as soon as I leave the building Windows might as well not be on here, unless I'm just showing somebody how cool parallels is.
    To answer the OP:
    I've got a MBP, a little bit faster than the macbook in question. Our machines here at work(desktops mind you) have 2.6ghz C2D with 2GB ram each. I'm running a 2.16ghz C2D with 2GB ram. With super pi I a 2 seconds slower time than the desktop(54 vs 56). That's pretty impressive to me. Now, I don't know for a fact exactly why that happened but I have an idea that it's because apple hand picks the components they use, so you know they are made to work perfectly with each other.

    I would say Windows runs better on a Mac than a comparably equipped PC.
     
  10. M@lew

    M@lew Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    38
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    XP with Parallels runs fine. Vista on the other hand is horrible.
     
  11. PaulCky411

    PaulCky411 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    i'm running XP pro w/ parallels and it runs, in my opinion, better than it did on my previous laptops that were made for XP
     
  12. lolmannz

    lolmannz Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi guys thanks for the tips. I've ordered the 2.0GHz with 1GB RAM macbook, although one thing that is bothering me is it only comes with a combo drive, and to get the superdrive I have to pay quite a bit more to go up to the next option.

    Is it changeable later on? Does Apple have an official service for this or is it DIY?
     
  13. zadillo

    zadillo Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    421
    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    I'd really recommend getting that higher combination with a SuperDrive in it, personally.

    If cost is an option, consider a refurb MacBook with the superdrive.

    As it is right now, there aren't any replacement optical drives for the MacBook (this may change in the future, but it isn't an option right now).

    -Zadillo
     
  14. SauronMOS

    SauronMOS Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    173
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You can buy SuperDrives for the MacBook with a bit of googling. I've found them before but too lazy to look right now. They run about $150 for the 6x. But then you have to consider that you'll be taking your MacBook apart to put it in.

    The wise thing to do would be to cancel your current order and just get one with a SuperDrive. You'll be getting a faster processor and more HDD space, so it will be worth the money.