The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    MBP 8600 GT Performance

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by Kickstart, May 11, 2008.

  1. Kickstart

    Kickstart Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Hello all,

    I've been toying with getting a MBP 17". I was wondering how the performance of the 8600 is? Specifically:

    -How does it do in Vista? (I know, Leopard is better -it really is- but Vista is used at work).

    -I'm not a huge gamer but I do enjoy some FPS games. How does the 8600 perform with games like COD4, Bio Shock, Crysis, etc?

    -Do you think going LED was a good thing for Apple? I know the battery life increased and it seems quite amazing at the Best Buy store that carries MBPs. Any issues?


    Thanks for the input, :)
    K
     
  2. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    crysis runs medium at 1280x800 or medium / high at 1024x640.

    cod4 runs great at 1280x800 and high settings.

    i don't know about bioshock, but obviously it will run pretty good. maybe 1280x800 medium high settings.
     
  3. S.SubZero

    S.SubZero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    467
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    81
  4. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    the 8600m gt gets an 8.8!!!

    the 7900 gs only gets an 8.1...

    that means the 8600m gt is like 10% faster! (not really, more expressing the fact that gpureview is a joke)

    we should be clear about this. the 7900gs was not a midrange gpu. it was only found in 17" laptops and was approximately as fast as a mobile 7800, but it also took less battery life and ran cooler. there were also a variety of mobile 79xx series cards.

    the midrange card was called the "go 7600". the 8600m gt replaces that card. it is for 15" laptops primarily. the 8600m gt is approximately as powerful as a 7900 gs.
     
  5. S.SubZero

    S.SubZero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    467
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    81
    If you ONLY look at the voting part, then you are looking at.. um.. votes. The parts below that, the parts with the actual numbers and information on the parts, is the more useful and important part.

    Talking about gaming GPUs (not general purpose integrated shared RAM things) the 7900gs was mid-range. I recently replaced the 7900gs Go in my Inspiron E1705 with a 7950GTX Go, and it added 50% to my 3DMark06 score.
     
  6. cathy

    cathy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The 8600M GT is totally kickass, but you'd probably need to fool around with your clocks a little first though, since Apple downclocked the cards. 5300 points in 3DMark06 @ 600/900. :)
     
  7. cdnalsi

    cdnalsi Food for the funky people

    Reputations:
    433
    Messages:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I've played Bioshock. 1280x800 med/high settings, works like a charm!
     
  8. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    yep. just download atitool and set the 3d clocks up to about 475/700 (or higher if you want)

    @ subzero

    you would rather try to compare gpu performance by looking at 8600m gt FLOPS vs 7900 gs FLOPS?

    or would you like to compare shader numbers?

    or texture fill rate? memory bandwidth?

    its all pointless. the only number that matters is frames / second, and the cards are equal in new games.

    and 3dmark06 is probably the most pointless number of all.
     
  9. S.SubZero

    S.SubZero Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    467
    Messages:
    1,348
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    81
    For some of the stats, they are specific to the apps that require them. Shader speed is not very important on games that don't use shaders. The 7900GS Go is faster in overall memory bandwidth and raw throughput, which has overall implications. The 128-bit memory of the 8600M GT is shared by the desktop 8600's, which is why they are shunned by PC gamers.
     
  10. HLdan

    HLdan Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,088
    Messages:
    2,142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    You basically answered your own question in regards to the LED screens. Also it's environmentally friendly.
     
  11. mikespit1

    mikespit1 Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    40
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    How old is the 8600? Does anyone think that Apple with refresh the MBP around WWDC to something like the 9600?
     
  12. Xirurg

    Xirurg ORLY???

    Reputations:
    3,189
    Messages:
    7,375
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    206
    ^we all hope that apple "will"... :D
     
  13. vengance_01

    vengance_01 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    61
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    8600GT is a great mobile gpu. O/C the card and you will see some very nice gains.