The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    MBP -- Difference Between 2.5 and 2.6 ghz processors?

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by Koralan, Apr 28, 2008.

  1. Koralan

    Koralan Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    For the 15.4" MBP, there is an option to upgrade the 2.5 ghz processor to a 2.6 ghz processor for 250 dollars. Is there any difference between these two chips besides the .1 ghz because for $250 that doesn't seem like a worthwhile upgrade...
     
  2. stealthsniper96

    stealthsniper96 What Was I Thinkin'?

    Reputations:
    207
    Messages:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Most likely not. What will you be using the computer for?
     
  3. laotzu

    laotzu Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Are you referring to a T9300 vs a T9400?

    If so, then if you look around the net long enough, you will see many threads on many forums where people mention how useless the T9400 is. It is basically Intel's most pointless processor ever.

    If not, the point still holds that an extra $250 for .1ghz is simply not worth your money.

    Go with the 2.5ghz unless your trying to throw money away :p

    Best Wishes,
    Kyle
     
  4. nahiyan13

    nahiyan13 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Let me correct you on a trivial mistake.There is no 'T9400' processor.It is T9500 with 2.6 GHZ clock speed.And yes I agree with you, an extra $250 for 0.1 HZ is not worth it. :)
     
  5. masterchef341

    masterchef341 The guy from The Notebook

    Reputations:
    3,047
    Messages:
    8,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    206
    the extra $500 goes into .1ghz of processor speed, extra vram (useless), and 50GB of extra hdd space.

    definitely NOT worth it.
     
  6. Chris27

    Chris27 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    421
    Messages:
    955
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The T9400 has twice the cache (6mb vs 3mb). Still, for most cpu intensive tasks, I wouldn't expect much more than a 5-10% performance increase, so in my book the more expensive model isn't worth it, especially since the GPU is no longer castrated with just 128mb of ram.
     
  7. Sam

    Sam Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    3,661
    Messages:
    9,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I would not get it. Its not enough to make a noticeable difference in everyday computing. Use that $250 for other things!
     
  8. niemassacre

    niemassacre Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Do not upgrade from 2.5 to 2.6 GHz on the high end MBP model. Please don't. Really, it would make me sad. 100 MHz is not worth $250.
     
  9. Texzin

    Texzin Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I am also thinking of buying a MBP 15.4........will the new 2.4 be fine or do I need to get the 2.5 because it has a better graphic card. Is it worth the 500 bucks.

    Thanks for your Help
     
  10. niemassacre

    niemassacre Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    You won't see much improvement with the 512mb card, since the 128-bit membus cripples the ability of the 8600 from making use of the extra VRAM. The 2.5 processor will be somewhat better than the 2.4 due to the doubled L2 cache, but its not like the 2.4 will really hold you back or anything.
     
  11. stealthsniper96

    stealthsniper96 What Was I Thinkin'?

    Reputations:
    207
    Messages:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Probly not, what are you going to use it for?
     
  12. Silv

    Silv Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    35
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Spend your savings on RAM. 250 bucks for 100 Mhz?

    Outrageous!

    I put the $250 towards 4G for my MBP and my fiancee's MB, and still had $50 left over to take her out for lunch.
     
  13. Arwin

    Arwin Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    the middle model (2.5ghz) seems like the best choice - you get the added bonus of the VRAM and the extra cache on the CPU, without throwing money away. Do not go for the 2.6ghz...pls :)
     
  14. Koralan

    Koralan Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I wasn't planning on it, I was just making sure there wasn't some deceptive difference between the two. thanks guys!
     
  15. Prasad

    Prasad NBR Reviewer 1337 NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    1,804
    Messages:
    4,956
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    106
    The T9300(2.5Ghz C2D) to T9500(2.6Ghz C2D) for ~$250 is the most useless & pointless upgrade I have seen to date.