The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    MBP - 2.66ghz and 2.93ghz model reviews??

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by zer0sum, May 16, 2009.

  1. zer0sum

    zer0sum Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Has anyone seen or done any PCmark, 3dmark etc performance testing with the slightly newer cpu's?

    I am really interested in them as you can run 8gb of ram and am wondering if the 2.93ghz is really worth the $300 premium...

    Z
     
  2. MKang25

    MKang25 NBR Prisoner

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    1,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    CPU score really do not matter in 3D Mark 06, any C2D above 2.4GHZ is sufficient, the bottleneck will be the graphics card in the system. Unless you plan on doing some serious video editing I do not think the 2.93 GHZ is worth it. It also takes up more battery just because its a T series CPU whereas the 2.66 is a P series so it uses less TDP = more battery life.
     
  3. SPEEDwithJJ

    SPEEDwithJJ NBR Super Idiot

    Reputations:
    865
    Messages:
    3,499
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Isn't the 2.66GHz CPU that Apple uses in their MBPs the Intel T9550 & not the Intel P9600? :confused:
     
  4. MKang25

    MKang25 NBR Prisoner

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    1,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    You were right sPeed, CPUZ tells me its the T9550 :(