I was originally intending to get a 13 inch Retina Macbook Pro. However, I found out that it only has an Iris 5100 whereas the 15 inch model has the 5200. Benchmark software seem to show that the 5200 is 200% better than the 5100. That's a huge difference, but these benchmarks aren't always accurate.
I intend to use the laptop for some light gaming (League of Legends, Minecraft) at native resolution.
Will the Iris 5100 be sufficient for my needs? Or should I get a laptop with a 5200, instead? At the moment, it seems only the 15 inch Macbook and the ASUS UX301 have it. I'd really prefer not to spend more money than I have to. Plus, a 13 inch laptop is much more convenient for me than a 15 inch.
-
Well, NotebookCheck's benchmarks would suggest that the 5200 is indeed quite a bit more powerful than the 5100.
Intel Iris Graphics 5100 - NotebookCheck.net Tech
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - NotebookCheck.net Tech -
performance wise there is no comparison. what are you wanting to run or do on your laptop? for gaming you would certainly NEED the 5200 IMO
-
-
saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate
-
kornchild2002 Notebook Deity
Right. Pushing a game, any modern game really, at that high of a resolution would require a higher end GPU than the Iris offerings in both the 13" and 15" MBPr models. You would need a dedicated Nvidia or AMD GPU to play either of those games at the 13" MBPr's native resolution at an enjoyable framerate (i.e. not 15 fps, something unplayable).
-
BTW, the Asus UX301 has the HD 5100, not the 5200.
How significant is the difference between Iris 5200 and 5100?
Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by York, Nov 23, 2013.