The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Gaming performance for C2D 2.2 MBP

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by easyeye, Sep 12, 2007.

  1. easyeye

    easyeye Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I havn't check back on this issue for awhile and all discussion about this topic seemed to cease. I just want to know if gaming performance has increased with new drivers. Also, from the other thread i read on the comparison between 128vram and 256vram, the turbocache ability on windows vista seemed promising, is this true? I never used windows vista for games before, just XP.

    Thanks
     
  2. vipergts2207

    vipergts2207 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    8
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well from my experience if I remember right I get 50-60 fps on WoW at max settings. On FEAR at max settings with screen res at 1440x900 the game runs ok. It just gets a little bit jumpy at times so I usually play at 1280x800.
     
  3. HitMaker

    HitMaker Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The 128vram 8600M GT can handle the 8600M GT 256vram clocks (350/500 vs 475/635 or something like this), i managed to overclocked it over 500/700 without a problem and the temperatures were almost the same, a few degrees more at all. So at the same frecuency the performance is almost the same depending on the game's vram consumption.

    "Saludos"
     
  4. zepharus

    zepharus Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    What did you use to overclock? I have the newest laptop2go drivers , Vista 32, and Riva Tuner 2.1 or something like that. I cannot get it to overclock...

    Thanks in advance
     
  5. easyeye

    easyeye Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    350/500? it's that slow on the new mbp?? dang
    I've been overclocking my 1st gen mbp to 410/470, hopefully this new chip is better than the 1st gen underperforming x1600.
     
  6. HitMaker

    HitMaker Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Actually is really weird, i tried several times but the clocks were going back to default (using ntune, rivatuner or atitool), then after several attemps the clocks were up to 475/635 if i remember correct, then again, for some reason i don´t know they were up after several attemps to 500/650 I think.

    REALLY wierd, but at list the 8600M GT clocks are possible for sure.

    I hope they released a driver or some fix that it could let us to overclock the card without these weird things.

    easyeye, those clocks are for the 128vram, the 256 vram works at 475/635 or so (i don't remember the clocks for sure, maybe they are 450/635...)

    The temperature doesn't rise to much after overclocking ;)
     
  7. sheldon77

    sheldon77 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    31
    Messages:
    454
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i thought they were clocked the same. why are they clocked at different when they're the same card, only difference is the amount of vram?
     
  8. easyeye

    easyeye Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    4
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    so Hitmaker do you use the stock driver from bootcamp or modified?
     
  9. HitMaker

    HitMaker Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I tried several drivers, first the stock driver, then the 163.44 and the last one i tried was the 165.01 one i think.

    I read the 158.XX one allows overclocking without these weird things... altough i didn't try it.

    "Saludos"