Yes...it's *this* question again. Take your best potshots!
Actually, what's a good text editor just for OSX?
-
Try cream , as visual as vi could possible get
-
I never liked any of them... Emacs is more powerful, but I guess it is way too powerful. Vi(m) is more streamlined, but I don't like some of the design decisions. If I just want to type and edit text, I'd like something simpler. Hence I voted "other".
-
text wrangler, simple and effective. If I need something more complicated I'll use Word.
-
For a simple text editor it doesn't get much more simple than vi. Though learning the keyboard shortcuts too me a few hours the first time, I find it effective and very fast.
-
Pico for shell environments, TextEdit or similar for gui environments. My needs are not very advanced though, as I don't program much (and when I do, I'll use an editor dedicated to it).
-
A good text editor just for OS X would be Textmate. A good text editor for the *NIX shell would be Emacs for more heavier and advanced documents, and VIM for less advanced ones.
-
VV -
Here in sweden some prefer "smultron".
Vim ofcourse. -
Emacs can be effectively used as an IDE. The same can be achived with VIM, but it is less user friendly and a pain to set up. Emacs also has useful libraries, which allows it to run tetris etc., which is a must have after hours of non stop source code editing.
Nevertheless, both are in my opinion inferior to Textmate on OS X.
Emacs or Vim
Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by taelrak, Aug 11, 2007.