The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    About iTune 9.1

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by DJRiful, Apr 9, 2010.

  1. DJRiful

    DJRiful Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    23
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The new option for iPhone / iPod Touch users able to "Convert higher bit rate songs to 128 kbps AAC" took nearly 6 hours to sync already and on going right now...

    It's only 1600 songs of my 9800...

    : (


    I'm stunned...

    but I think it will worth it... save up 30-40% extra spaces.
     
  2. exi

    exi Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    46
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Saw that option and briefly considered it, but I've got ~7600 songs in my library, many of which are at 256 kbps or better on average. I'd be worried about having taken a clean source, ripped to a lossy format (mp3, despite high bitrate), and then converting again to another lossy format (AAC, at a lower bitrate).

    I understand that the conversion is for songs only on the device (the original stays the same), but... eh, still.
     
  3. Xhibit

    Xhibit Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    131
    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yeah I wouldn't convert mp3 into another lossy format, especially at such a low bit-rate.
     
  4. swarmer

    swarmer beep beep

    Reputations:
    2,071
    Messages:
    5,234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Don't expect the music to sound as good.

    But then again, if you're listening with cheap earphones such as the ones they bundle with the device, then you probably won't be able to tell.
     
  5. DJRiful

    DJRiful Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    23
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    i noticed the sound quality with my Ultimate Ears SuperFi 4 but on the trade off it only used up 7gb of space. Before it was taken up 20gb of space.
     
  6. Sam

    Sam Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    3,661
    Messages:
    9,249
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Wow that is a lot of saved space! Although I personally would have kept the quality and bought an external instead :p. I'm using Sennheiser IE7s so I'm after pretty high quality music, but then again my music library is pretty small, around 500 songs (I'm still young :p), so storage isn't a huge problem for me.
     
  7. sulkorp

    sulkorp Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    145
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It all depends on the user. I know many people use the stock buds that come with the ipods, and are perfectly fine with that. Another person I know only uses one earphone, so he converted all his songs to mono to save space, and hear both channels in the one ear.

    For me, listening with my shures I can hear the diference in bitrates, and the same for when im driving in my car.

    But probably for the vast majority of people, they'd rather have more songs at a lower quality, then higher quality. And have more space for videos, apps, etc
     
  8. exi

    exi Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    46
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ultimately, yep, that's it.

    (But listening to mono music all the time? Oh man.)
     
  9. MKang25

    MKang25 NBR Prisoner

    Reputations:
    179
    Messages:
    1,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Ya about a year ago I became a neophyte audiophile, bought my self a pair of Westones UM3x and found Flac versions for all the songs in my library and god how different my music sounded.
     
  10. swarmer

    swarmer beep beep

    Reputations:
    2,071
    Messages:
    5,234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    The irony is that a few years back Apple switched the iTunes store from 128 kbps to 256 kbps... and the improved quality was a selling point. Now they have this new feature which makes it easy to convert everything down to 128 kbps...
     
  11. Xhibit

    Xhibit Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    131
    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yeah I'm surprised they let users turn mp3 and other lossy formats to AAC, even if its a better format than mp3, you should never convert from a lossy format to another lossy format, as you'll lose even more data, usually sounding real bad. They should at least warn you that you risk losing a lot of audio quality.