The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    15" 2011 Macbook Pro

    Discussion in 'Apple and Mac OS X' started by beep_, Jun 12, 2011.

  1. beep_

    beep_ Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi Guys

    I want to purchase the 2011 15" Macbook Pro 2.0Ghz version but I am worried about the lack of video memory (it only comes with 256mb) especially since I want to drive an external 1080 display as well as the internal display. Does anyone know if this will/won't be a problem or have some experience to share?
     
  2. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    My X220i with the Intel GPU can do 2560x1600 via the displayport. I think you'll be OK.
     
  3. kornchild2002

    kornchild2002 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,007
    Messages:
    1,925
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    66
    You will be fine. Even my 13" 2011 MBP is just fine when driving my 1080p HDTV and its internal display both at the same time. I have a higher resolution external display at work and my MBP is fine with that as well and it used only the Intel HD 3000 IGP, it doesn't have a dedicated option. In this day and age, the actual GPU is more important than how much RAM it comes with. That has actually been true for a while now. It also doesn't help that many manufacturers will put a ungodly amount of RAM with a certain graphics option that won't benefit from it. Not to single anyone out but I remember HP did that a while back with the ATI 9600. They had a configuration option offering a 9600 with 512MB of dedicated RAM. That card could not use all of that but HP offered it (they aren't the only company doing that).

    Driving external and internal displays is something that isn't resource intensive anymore. Even the older Intel 4500HD/4500MHD could handle that without issues while playing back 1080p videos.
     
  4. beep_

    beep_ Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Thanks alot guys, I think I'm gonna get it. Would you say the 2.2Ghz version is worth the extra $400?
     
  5. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Unless you've got a need to push the CPU frequently, I would say it's not worth it. Even if you do, it's marginal at best.