The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Ram Upgrade 5672?

    Discussion in 'Acer' started by JohnnyT, Mar 19, 2007.

  1. JohnnyT

    JohnnyT Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  2. jetstar

    jetstar Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,095
    Messages:
    7,034
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    It is better to buy RAM from a reputable maker such as Kingston, Corsair, Crucial or OCZ. I am not sure, but I think you'll most likely need PC2-5300 RAM.
     
  3. Zero

    Zero The Random Guy

    Reputations:
    422
    Messages:
    2,720
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    The "PC" number of a RAM module is worked out by multipying the frequency of the module by 8. So, for the 667 MHz RAM, it is 667 * 8 = 5336. The PC2 5300/5400 is worked out this way. The discrepancy appears, when some manufacturers round down, and some round up. There is no actual difference between the modeules.

    Out of the ones you have linked, they are all good modules. The prices are also very simialr, so you can make a decision on that. Theres no real performance difference between the modules.
     
  4. JohnnyT

    JohnnyT Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks for all your help, I think I will go with the corsair since it has served me well in the past.
     
  5. JohnnyT

    JohnnyT Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I ended up buying the corsair, and it will be here Friday. So if anyone would like me to run some test to see how much of a performance upgrade you get from 2g vs 1g in vista let me know.
     
  6. SSX4life

    SSX4life Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'm running 2gb in my 5672 and I couldn't game and run vista without it (not without turning some things off. I'm idling at 500 - 750mb page file on avg (which is rather high imho), leave it to vista to chew up cycles that are not needed. I'll be going back to XP Pro sooner or later, just need to find the time.

    If I game on vista it's not uncommon to see 1.3-1.4GB of pagefile usage.


    --ssx--
     
  7. ruisu

    ruisu Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I don't think that's neccessarily true. I noticed that there are more timing options on the 4300 and 5400's (not that you'll be able to change your memory timings on most notebooks).

    The extra options are insignificant though, because your notebook will default to the same timings on both 5300 and 5400. I believe the extra options have to do with tighter CAS/RAS at lower frequencies. And probably better overclockers. Again, not of much importance to most laptop users.