Or CPU-Z
-
From what I found through my long search is that it isn’t value ram because I didn’t see value ram clocked to 3466. I don’t know for sure, could be wrong but everything pointed to Hyper X between CL16-19. Hard to say for sure since Kingston doesn’t even show anything about it on their site. Their just isn’t any other SODIMMS clocked at 3466 yet and no reviews or anything. But until we actually see those numbers properly displayed were all just speculating.
-
One last thing. Don’t count your chickens about it being overclocked from the factory and sold that way because Dell is already dealing with plenty of other legal issues such as the underclocked RTX 3700’s which they hopped on a BIOS update pretty quick to resolve. Their are plenty of PC products that are sold as overclocked but I’ve never seen it not specified that way on the product info. Lot’s of video cards are factory overlcocked for example. But things like CPU’s and RAM are an entirely different animal. Those silicone wafers can be finicky if constantly overclocked. Blue screens or black screens come Win 11. Even my last expensive CPU, 6950X which I bought from Silicon lottery I paid $1700 for because it was cherry picked and tested. But large numbers of overlocked value ram sold as overclocked memory and not specified in the fine print doesn’t add up. Value Ram is just that. Value, which means not the best of the bunch so overclcock potential isn’t very high.
-
Obviously, you won't be able to use any Asus memory tweaking tools.
We have been near the bottom for a while now: AW have been supplying memory matching Kingston Value RAM CL for a while, including with flagships such as Area51M. Now, according to the data provided by @captn.ko they reached a new low by likely taking 3200 CL22 Kingston RAM, overclocking it to 3466 for marketing purposes (at the cost of 2 extra CL), and selling it as "SuperSpeed" RAM, even though it suffers from atrocious 99ns latency. Just when many may have thought they've seen it allIf that's not false advertising, along the lines of "the world's most upgradeable laptop", and "limitlessly thin", I am not sure what is. Bear in mind there is no 3466 memory on the market from the usual memory manufacturers.
Sure, a screenshot from CPU-Z would be good, maybe @captn.ko will find a moment to post it, although we have no reason to believe he is making things up, and I bet CL 24 would roughly match the latency if we did the math.
Abandon the HyperX dreams: there is no 3466 HyperX laptop memory, and HyperX modules sport black PCB. If you want to get the most out of the laptop, you have to upgrade to HyperX or better (if anything better works) yourself, and we can safely assume 3200 HyperX would outperform this 3466 "SuperSpeed" RAM.Last edited: Jul 10, 2021 -
One last thing. These SODIMMS are the same ones they’re advertising for their new Precision 7560 line. Workstations laptops that are designed to run fast and stable for number crunching. Selling overclocked value ram for gamers is one thing but for their business line is a horse of a different color. In fact most businesses frown on overclocked hardware in their systems which is why they’re so customizable on the order. If you look at the Precision sales page you see the word stability repeated several times. Just food for thought.
-
Even if what you said was true, that memory is very slow, I would not worry about its stability. With Precisions they prioritise stability rather than performance, any many Precision laptops use different (even slower, but more stable) ECC modules. -
Last edited: Jul 10, 2021
-
Well if your right then my magic 8 ball predicts future legal action on the Horizon. Not from me or most users but from some jackolantern in the bay area who has pockets of cash to throw around. Just think about how inexpensive SODIMMS are compared to the cost of litigation. Hence my jackolantern remark. Then again their’s always the class action option.
etern4l likes this. -
I’m half tempted to throw that sodimm in my latitude for the sole purpose of running HWINFO.
etern4l likes this. -
If you don't trust our German connection, then by all means: you should see all the XMP profiles even if they are not supported. Or just return outright and get some proper RAM.
-
Ok.. I got it all
-
Now that wasn’t so hard now was it? Took me all of 5 minutes to get the details.
-
etern4l likes this.
-
7760 meanwhile, it is sold at a 45% discount )
a huge list of options, 6 processors to choose from. 4 RAM slots from 8 to 128 GB.
9 display options. 4 slots for the m.2 drive. The ability to opt out of pre-installed Windows)
5 video cards flesh up to A5000 16GB - analog RTX 3080 16 GB )
https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/sho...017us_vp?view=configurations&configurationid= 08efead8-7379-4249-94c7-50375c499942 -
etern4l likes this.
-
pathfindercod Notebook Virtuoso
-
* The RAM only supports up to 3200 without overclocking via XMP (as I suspected)
* CL 22 @ 3200 without XMP (same as Kingston Value RAM) - for comparison HyperX Impact runs at CL20 @ 3200
* Supports CL 22 @ 3466 via XMP, but also supports slower CL 24
OK, so we know what the module is capable of. Now, the truth is that the RAM could in theory run at CL 22 but the relevant question is what CL it runs at inside the x17, since Dell can easily set a higher CL (for stability's sake for instance).. Before you say "they wouldn't do that", a reminder they recently went so far as to cut the number of CUDA cores in the m15 R5.
The only way to find out is to see what timings this RAM actually achieves inside the x17. Preliminary evidence: CL24, unfortunately that would indicate they might slow down third party RAM too.Last edited: Jul 10, 2021 -
http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...r5-owners-lounge.835745/page-43#post-11105866
http://forum.notebookreview.com/thr...r5-owners-lounge.835745/page-44#post-11106013
Btw. 100C also with the X15. The nice with unified heatsink.... The Cpu can use the Gpu side as heat-buffer in Cpu only tasks. The GPU follow the Cpu as hand in gloves in the Physics tests
-
-
-
-
-
-
Taken from the X17 user guide. And I don’t know this guy but no worries.
-
So I’m gonna try a little experiment. I just ordered a couple sticks of the 32gb hyperx from these guys and I’ll see for myself if it was worth the $460 it just cost me.
c69k, Flying Endeavor, raz8020 and 1 other person like this. -
It says right there, bro P. quoted that for you: "The 3466 Ram is not the fastest one.... CL24"
All I can see is 16GB for $160, so 32GB would cost $320 - pretty expensive given that 64GB of HyperX costs $420.raz8020 likes this. -
-
The biggest risk is that the limitlessly thin laptop will nerf HyperX.Last edited: Jul 11, 2021 -
Last edited: Jul 11, 2021 -
DDR4-3466 RAM are 3200 @CL22 Stock, Supports XMP-3466 @CL22 but Dell crippled to XMP-3466 @CL24. IMHO would better buy the cheapest RAM config from Dell then swap to a DDR4-3200 @CL18/20, lets wait @JinTexas tell us if that works.
Newer TS results seems not bad tho, who are still getting less than 10K CPU, go to NVIDIA Control Panel and select dGPU in PhysX, it also improves GPU scores a bit. But not having mux or dGPU directly connected to display, killed the chance of beating GE76 Raider, and will have to settle for the Silver Medal (Excluding X170KM-G). You can bypass iGPU using a external monitor, but we are not rating the laptop itself anymore with that.
edit: Alienware told me 360Hz models will have Advanced Optimus and G-SYNC, so they still can steal the BGA Crown.
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/21394438 - SCORE 13057 (Graphics 13241 / CPU 12108)
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/21393136 - SCORE 13045 (Graphics 13243 / CPU 12029)
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/21395194 - SCORE 13027 (Graphics 13281 / CPU 11755)
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/21394304 - SCORE 12948 (Graphics 13084 / CPU 12228)
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/21392649 - SCORE 12942 (Graphics 13248 / CPU 11449)
Cinebench R20 -50mv @4.6GHz all cores ~108W CPU Power Draw
Cinebench R23 -50mv @4.6GHz all cores ~111W CPU Power Draw
Last edited: Jul 12, 2021 -
-
The 2 sticks of 32gb HyperX I ordered from GoVets like 8 hours ago have already processed and about to be shipped from the email I just got. Damn that was fast. Wish Dell worked that fast. See gentlemen. We Vets and the organizations who support us are fast and efficient. If you can, please also support the Wounded Warriors. I myself and a Wounded Warrior alumni and 100% disabled from combat in Iraq. I know, shameful plug but Buying from places like Go Vets which not only had this hard to find memory but also $200 cheaper then Newegg is a good deal for you that also contributes to folks like myself. Nearly 1/3 of my company that I fought with during the 15 months of Hell in the Baghdad surge with the 82nd Airborne Division were wounded while fighting, including 3 of my brothers who made the ultimate sacrifice. 38 wounded and 3 fatalities. Twelve of my brothers were double Purple Heart recipients. I was the Senior Medic for my Company of 116 Paratroopers.
https://www.govets.com/index.php/kingston-technology-312-3905981.html
c69k likes this. -
-
Someone who received their order please check to see how fast your SSD is. I wonder if Dell is using PCIe 4.0 SSD’s in the slot that supports it. I remember reading a review about a new XPS with 11th gen CPU, and in the review Dell did not ship with the faster SSD which supported it. The reviewer made it a point to say he swapped out the SSD with a Samsung 980 pro. And another reason why I ordered my X17 the smallest SSD allowed thinking Dell might do the same with the X series.
-
raz8020 and Nicolas Paiva like this.
-
-
-
4.5ghz with UV. Still room for improvement. But its to warm
Clamibot, etern4l and Nicolas Paiva like this. -
werdmonkey4321 Notebook Evangelist
I'm curious if anyone has done any thermal comparisons yet from replacing the stock gallium-silicon thermal paste with liquid metal? Alienware claims the new paste is good, but I'm hesitant to believe them. If no one has done it by now that's fine as I plan to do it when my unit arrives. I just don't want to double up on someone else's effort if it's not worth the trouble.
-
-
Would be interesting to see how the result and temps compare to other 11980HK laptops.raz8020 likes this. -
Note: this is still stock paste with summer ambient temps (26°C). With that background this is actually not bad in my opinion. I expected much worse -
captn.ko likes this.
-
Comparing these 11980HK results with a Desktop 11900K.
- 11980HK matches performances at same clock speed (Basically same microarchitecture with few tweaks for 14nm+++ port)
- Has more performance by far at same Power
- Seems to consume ~35% less for same performance
- 14nm in 2021 is bizarre, lucky 11900K can stretch his legs to 230W+, so you can have more 15% performance with 100% more power consumption.Clamibot likes this. -
Please do also note that raising the back of the laptop helps to improve temperatures furthermore.
Curently I'm waiting for my new RAM 32GB 3200Mhz, [email protected]. I guess this will boost CPU performance greatly when using the internal display.turilo, werdmonkey4321, bsch3r and 4 others like this.
*OFFICIAL* Alienware X Series Owners Lounge and Discussion
Discussion in '2015+ Alienware 13 / 15 / 17' started by HaloGod2012, May 11, 2021.