The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Gtx 980m 4gbvram vs Gtx 980m 8gb vram

    Discussion in '2015+ Alienware 13 / 15 / 17' started by TastefulTech, Feb 8, 2016.

  1. jrsx2689

    jrsx2689 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    22
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Yeah well I second that. Benchmarks alone prove that.
     
    iunlock likes this.
  2. iunlock

    iunlock 7980XE @ 5.4GHz

    Reputations:
    2,035
    Messages:
    4,533
    Likes Received:
    6,441
    Trophy Points:
    581
    jrsx2689 likes this.
  3. rinneh

    rinneh Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    854
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    2,191
    Trophy Points:
    231
    The games tested are fairly old though. It will change ofcourse in the future but the question is. Will the mobile 980m be still enough then.
     
  4. jrsx2689

    jrsx2689 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    22
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    26
    "Fairly old" is considerable info as opposed to wasting the money for something in the long run will outlast it's counterparts.

    In our defense we are looking at Adobe products not games.

    In regards to games unless you have to go the route for a " gaming laptop" i'd keep my beast of a machine a desktop. (Personal preference of course)

    Good question though I'd like to really look into even more because for games it's enough now but I've seen post back in 2008 claiming it wouldn't be enough and yet here we are....

    Now with VR around the corner maybe that's the exception.
    I mean how many years we talking to continue under the 4gb spectrum?
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2016
  5. zergslayer69

    zergslayer69 Liquid Hz

    Reputations:
    62
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    66
    I shoud mention VR with the 980m is irrelevant as optimus is getting in the way of letting us plug the VR headset directly into the laptop. We would need to run the headunit through the graphics amp, and that point, we are free to choose something with more vram.

    For games though as I always mention (and earlier in the thread), you're going to be maxing out the raw power of the card (aka not 60fps) before you're maxing out the vram.
     
    iunlock likes this.
  6. jrsx2689

    jrsx2689 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    22
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    26
    Yeah with VR I wasnt taking m specs here. I'm saying in general with VR will 4gb be enough then.

    Yeah always going to be maxing out raw power especially any M series.
     
  7. rinneh

    rinneh Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    854
    Messages:
    4,897
    Likes Received:
    2,191
    Trophy Points:
    231
    They say that but I am not sure about that to be honest. I actually recently tested DK2 myself on my laptop and it ran fine. The owner of the headset is a game developer also running an optimus laptop.
     
  8. zergslayer69

    zergslayer69 Liquid Hz

    Reputations:
    62
    Messages:
    1,551
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    66
    You didn't experience any latency? I think that's the main issue people keep claiming that optimus machines are no good. Or, maybe they ruled out laptops entirely to avoid people with $500 best buy machines complaining that VR sucks. After all desktop 970 equivalent laptops are basically only whovever has a 980m which is a very very small % of the laptop market. Pretty certain the 980m can do the rift just fine unless the SDK somehow blocks the laptops.
     
← Previous page